Pietrafeso v. Sunrise Senior Living Management, Inc ( 2023 )

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 PAMELA PIETRAFESO, Case No. 2:22-cv-02010-RFB-NJK 7 Plaintiff(s), Order 8 9 Vv. [Docket No. 27] SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING 10), MANAGEMENT, INC., 11 Defendant(s). 12 Pending before the Court is a stipulation to stay discovery pending resolution of 13] Defendant’s motion to dismiss. Docket No. 27. In assessing the circumstances and the governing 14} standards, see, e.g., Kor Media Grp., LLC v. Green, 294 F.R.D. 579, 581 (D. Nev. 2013), the Court 15] finds that a stay of discovery is warranted.! Accordingly, the stipulation to stay discovery is 16] GRANTED. 17 If the resolution of the motion to dismiss does not result in the termination of this case, an amended discovery plan must be filed within 14 days of the order resolving the motion to dismiss. 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 Dated: May 30, 2023 Nancy J. Koppe€ 22 United States. agistrate Judge 23 □ 24 25 26) ————__"DW@/»/_> ' The determination that a stay is warranted is closer than it would be ordinarily given that 27} the parties waited so long to seek that relief. Cf JoshCo Tech, LLC v. MJJ&L Holdings, 2020 WL 8254262, *1-2 (D. Nev. Sept. 2, 2020). Counsel would be well served in the future to seek a stay 28] of discovery more promptly.