Arcos v. Hudson Insurance Company ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 14 15 KRISTINE ARCOS, an individual; ) CASE NO.: 3:22-cv-00493-LRH-CSD ) 16 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION 17 v. ) FOR DISMISSAL WITH ) PREJUDICE 18 HUDSON INSURANCE COMPANY, ROE ) 19 CORPORATIONS I-X and DOES I-X inclusive, ) ) 20 Defendants. ) ) 21 22 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties and 23 respective counsel that the above-entitled case be dismissed with prejudice with each party to 24 bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 1 ||) DATED this 17" day of July, 2023. DATED this 17" day of July, 2023. 2 ||} GORDON REES GALLOWAY & JENSEN 3 SCULLY MANSUKHANI LLP 4 /s/_ Thierry V. Barkley /s/_ Graham Galloway ROBERT E. SCHUMACHER, ESQ. GRAHAM GALLOWAY, ESQ. 5 ||| Nevada Bar No. 7504 Nevada Bar No. 221 300 South 4" Street, Suite 1550 222 California Avenue 6 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Reno, Nevada 89509 7 ||| THIERRY V. BARKELY, ESQ. Attorneys for the Plaintiff 8 Nevada Bar No. 724 KRISTINE ARCOS GORDON REES SCULLY 9 ||| MANSUKHANI, LLP 1 East Liberty Street, Suite 424 10 ||| Reno, Nevada 89501 11 ||) Attorneys for Defendant, HUDSON INSURANCE COMPANY 13 (14 15 ORDER —<_——_ vi a 16 Upon Stipulation by Counsel for the Parties, and good cause appearing therefore, so 17 IT IS ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice with each party bearing 18 || its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 19 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter final judgment 20 || accordingly, dismiss the action, and close the case. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 DATED this 17" day of July, 2023. . 23 Gi R. HICKS 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25 26 27 28