Wright-Hicks v. Tropical Smoothie Cafe LLC ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA KIARA WRIGHT-HICKS, Case No.: 2:23-cv-00621-APG-BNW 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case v. [ECF No. 11] TROPICAL SMOOTHIE CAFE LLC, 7 Defendant 8 On August 17, 2023, Magistrate Judge Weksler recommended that I dismiss this case 9] without prejudice because plaintiff Kiara Wright-Hicks did not file a second amended complaint 10}| by the given deadline. ECF No. 11. The plaintiff did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring 12}| district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified 13} proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1411121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 16 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Weksler’s report and recommendation No. 11) is accepted and the plaintiff’s amended complaint (ECF No. 8) is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 19 DATED this 6th day of September, 2023. 20 a ANDREWP.GORDON. SS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23

Document Info

Docket Number: 2:23-cv-00621-APG-BNW

Filed Date: 9/6/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/25/2024