Brooks v. Hubbell ( 2024 )

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 * * * 5 James L. Brooks, Case No. 2:23-cv-00757-JAD-DJA 6 Plaintiff, 7 Order v. 8 Paul Hubbell, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 12 Before the Court are Plaintiff’s motion “to get subpoena” and for records (ECF No. 67) 13 and motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 70). 14 I. Motion to get subpoena and for records. 15 Plaintiff moves to obtain his medical records from “Internal Affairs” for the Reno Police 16 Department1 and from the Nevada Department of Corrections. (ECF No. 67). He also seeks to 17 discover each individual Defendant’s “work history, suspensions, disciplinary, and any other 18 reports.” (Id.). The title of Plaintiff’s motion also indicates that he is seeking to subpoena 19 “W.C.S.O.” and St. Mary’s. (Id.). Defendants oppose Plaintiff’s motion. (ECF Nos. 73, 74, 75). 20 The Court will grant Plaintiff’s motion to the extent it seeks a subpoena for third parties 21 St. Mary’s and W.C.S.O. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(a)(3), “[t]he clerk must issue 22 a subpoena, signed but otherwise in blank, to a party who requests it. That party must complete it 23 before service.” Because Plaintiff has requested subpoenas to two third parties, the Court will 24 issue two subpoenas, signed but otherwise in blank, to Plaintiff for him to complete and serve. 25 26 27 1 The Court assumes that Plaintiff is referring to the Reno Police Department’s Internal Affairs Division given the fact that he was referred to that division when serving his summons on Reno 1 The Court will deny Plaintiff’s motion to the extent it seeks to subpoena Defendants or to 2 request documents from Defendants. If Plaintiff seeks documents from Defendants, a Federal 3 Rule of Civil Procedure 34 document request directed to and served on Defendants is the proper 4 way to do so, not a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 subpoena or a motion. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 5(d)(1)(A) (explaining that discovery requests must not be filed with the Court until they are used 6 in the proceeding or the court orders filing); see McCall v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., 2:16- 7 cv-01058-JAD-GWF, 2017 WL 3174914, at *6 (D. Nev. July 26, 2017) (explaining that a Rule 8 45 subpoena “cannot be used to circumvent Rule 34 or the other discovery rules.”). 9 II. Motion for appointment of counsel. 10 Courts have authority to request that an attorney represent any person unable to afford 11 counsel. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Whether to appoint counsel is within the discretion of the 12 district court and requires a showing of exceptional circumstances. Agyeman v. Corrections 13 Corp. of America, 390 F.3d 1101, 1103 (9th Cir. 2004). To determine whether exceptional 14 circumstances exist, courts consider the likelihood that the plaintiff will succeed on the merits as 15 well as the plaintiff’s ability to articulate his claims “in light of the complexity of the legal issues 16 involved.” Id. Neither factor is dispositive, and both must be viewed together. Wilborn v. 17 Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986). 18 Plaintiff explains in his motion that he has been struggling to obtain discovery in the form 19 of body camera video, medical records, and the Defendants’ personnel records. (ECF No. 70 at 20 2). No party has responded to Plaintiff’s motion. However, Plaintiff has recently informed the 21 Court that he was able to watch the body camera footage he requested.2 (ECF No. 79). And the 22 Court has issued the subpoenas Plaintiff requested to serve on St. Mary’s and W.C.S.O. to request 23 24 25 2 Plaintiff’s notice also appears to indicate that Defendant is anticipating sending discovery documents he receives to the Court. (ECF No. 79). To the extent Plaintiff is suggesting that he 26 will send documents to the Court, the Court informs him that he need not send documents he 27 receives in discovery to the Court. Specifically, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(d)(1)(A), “discovery requests and responses must not be filed [with the Court] until they are 1 his medical records. Finally, the Court has explained that Plaintiff may request documents from 2 Defendants by serving a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34 request for production of documents. 3 Ultimately, the difficulties Plaintiff has described appear to be resolved or soon to be 4 resolved. Additionally, Plaintiff’s case is at the early motion-to-dismiss stage and thus, it is 5 unclear if Plaintiff is likely to succeed on the merits. And thus far, Plaintiff has demonstrated an 6 ability to articulate his claims and the discovery he needs. The Court thus denies Plaintiff’s 7 motion without prejudice. 8 9 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion “to get subpoenas” (ECF No. 10 67) is granted in part and denied in part. It is granted in part regarding Plaintiff’s request for 11 two subpoenas to serve on third parties. It is denied in all other respects. The Clerk of Court is 12 kindly directed to issue two subpoenas, signed but otherwise in blank, to Plaintiff. Plaintiff must 13 complete the subpoenas before service. 14 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel (ECF 15 No. 70) is denied without prejudice. 16 17 DATED: February 29, 2024 18 DANIEL J. ALBREGTS 19 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27