Michael J. Coffey v. US Federal Government ( 2023 )

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Case No.: 2:23-cv-01739-JAD-NJK 4 |! Michael J. Coffey, 5 we Plaintiff Order Adopting Report & Recommendatio 6 and Dismissing Action v. 7 U.S. Federal Government, et al., 8 [ECF No. 3] 9 Defendants 10 1] On October 20, 2023, the magistrate judge recommended that plaintiff Michael J. 12 || Coffey’s complaint be dismissed with prejudice because of “the delusional factual scenario and 13 nonexistent legal interest at issue.”! Coffey had fourteen days to object to that recommendation 14 || but he neither filed objections nor moved to extend the deadline to do so. “[N]o review is 15 || required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.” 16 || Having reviewed the R&R, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do. 17 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation 18 || [ECF No. 3] is ADOPTED in its entirety. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice, and the 19 || Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. 20 U.S. Dist idge Je {nite A. Dorse 22 December 5, 202 23 24 25 26 97 ||! ECF No. 3 at 2. > Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 47 28 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).