Garlin v. Veterans Association of Palo Alto ( 2023 )

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA BRIAN B. GARLIN, Case No.: 2:23-cv-01321-APG-EJY 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case v. [ECF No. 5] VETERANS ASSOCIATION OF PALO ALTO, 7 Defendant 8 9 On November 15, 2023, Magistrate Judge Youchah recommended that I dismiss this case without prejudice because plaintiff Brian Garlin has not complied with court orders to file an 11}}amended complaint. ECF No. 5. Garlin did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 17 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Youchah’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 5) is accepted, plaintiff Brian Garlin’s complaint (ECF No. 1-1) is dismissed without 19}! prejudice, and the clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 20 DATED this 6th day of December, 2023. 22 ANDREW P. GORDON 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE