Brown v. FFIC Goodwill ( 2024 )

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7| JESSICA M. BROWN, Case No. 2:24-cv-00469-ART-NJK 8 Plaintiff(s), Order v. [Docket Nos. 8, 9, 10] 10] FFIC GOODWILL, et al., 11 Defendant(s). 12 Pending before the Court are three motions, each consisting of a single sentence fragment. Docket Nos. 8, 9, 10. While the Court construes the filings of pro se litigants liberally, Blaisdell 14]| v. Frappiea, 729 F.3d 1237, 1241 (9th Cir. 2013), the Court is unable to discern what relief it is 15] that Plaintiff is seeking through these filings.' Accordingly, these three motions are DENIED 16] without prejudice. 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 Dated: April 24, 2024 19 PbS A Nancy J.Koppe _ 20 United States Magistrate Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 __—— CU ' The Court is also unable to read some of the handwriting on the filings. Moving forward, Plaintiff must ensure that all handwriting is legible. Local Rule IA 10-1(a)(2).