Allison v. Clark County District Attorney's Office ( 2024 )

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * * 7 RONALD J. ALLISON, Case No. 2:22-cv-00239-RFB-MDC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER 9 v. 10 CLARK COUNTY DISTRICT 11 ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, et al. 12 Defendant. 13 14 Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 8) of the 15 Honorable Maximiliano D. Couvillier, III, United States Magistrate Judge, entered on April 19, 16 2024. A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or 17 recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific 18 written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 19 636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is 20 required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed 21 findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local 22 Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct 23 “any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 24 Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due 25 by May 3, 2024. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case and 26 concurs with all the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations. 27 28 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 8) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is dismissed. The Clerk of Court is instructed to close this matter accordingly. 5 6 DATED: May 14, 2024. AS RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-