McFarland v. Chuck ( 2024 )

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA ALLYN MCFARLAND, Case No.: 2:23-cv-01972-APG-MDC 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation v. [ECF No. 4] CHUCK, et al., 7 Defendants 8 On March 26, 2024, Magistrate Judge Couvillier recommended that I dismiss this case because plaintiff Allyn McFarland did not file an amended complaint by the given deadline. ECF 4. McFarland did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the 11}|report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 16 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Couvillier’s report and recommendation 17|| (ECF No. 4) is accepted and this case is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 19 DATED this 10th day of April, 2023. OIA. 20 ANDREWP.GORDON sis UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 22 23