Adams v. Fox ( 2024 )

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA ALICIA ADAMS, et al., Case No.: 2:23-cv-00474-APG-BNW 4 Plaintiffs Order Accepting Report and Recommendation v. [ECF Nos. 28, 45] JEREMY FOX, et al., 7 Defendants 8 On March 25, 2024, Magistrate Judge Weksler recommended that I grant in part and 9] deny in part defendants Crystal Eller and Crystal Eller Esq.’s (Eller Defendants) motion for costs 10} and order the plaintiffs to pay the Eller Defendants $1,929.96 within 30 days from March 25. No. 45. No one objected. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the 12}|report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is 14! made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the 15}| district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if 16}| objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 17 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Weksler’s report and recommendation No. 45) is accepted. The Eller Defendants’ motion for costs (ECF No. 28) is granted in part and denied in part as set forth in Judge Weksler’s report and recommendation. 20 I FURTHER ORDER that the plaintiffs shall pay the Eller Defendants $1,929.96 by 21] April 26, 2024. 22 DATED this 10th day of April, 2023. (fn. 23 ANDREWP.GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE