Lowery v. Lombardo ( 2024 )

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 BRANDON DALE LOWERY, 4 Plaintiff, Case No.: 2:24-cv-01117-GMN-DJA 5 vs. 6 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND JOE LOMBARDO, et al. RECOMMENDATION 7 Defendants. 8 9 Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), (ECF No. 8), of 10 United States Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts, which recommends dismissing Plaintiff’s 11 case without prejudice. Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint by the deadline and did 12 not respond to the Order to Show Cause as to why the Court should not dismiss the action for 13 failure to prosecute. (See Orders, ECF Nos. 5, 7). 14 A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a 15 United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); 16 D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo 17 determination of those portions to which objections are made if the Magistrate Judge’s findings 18 and recommendations concern matters that may not be finally determined by a magistrate 19 judge. D. Nev. R. IB 3-2(b). The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the 20 findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. R. 21 IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is not required to conduct “any 22 review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 23 140, 149 (1985) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a 24 district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s R&R where no objections have been 25 filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1122 (9th Cir. 2003). ] Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed. (See R&R, ECF 2 || No. 8) (setting a November 13, 2024, deadline for objections). 3 Accordingly, 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 8), is 5 || ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. 6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. 7 Dated this_19 day of November, 2024. 9 Gloria/M. Navarro, District Judge 10 United States District Court 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 2 of 2