Little Darlings of Las Vegas, LLC v. City of Las Vegas ( 2024 )

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Little Darlings of Las Vegas, LLC, Case No.: 2:24-cv-01507-CDS-EJY 5 Plaintiff Order Granting Defendant’s Motion for Leave to File Surreply 7|| City of Las Vegas, [ECF No. 13] 8 Defendant 9 10 On September 24, 2024, defendant City of Las Vegas (“the City”) filed a motion for leave 1]|| to file a surreply in response to plaintiff Little Darlings of Las Vegas’s reply and request to advance and consolidate trial on the merits pursuant to Rule 65(a)(2). Mot., ECF No. 13. Little 13]| Darlings opposes the motion for leave. Opp’n, ECF No. 15. Local Rule 7-2 states that 14|| “[s]urreplies are not permitted without leave of court; motions for leave to file a surreply are 15|| discouraged.” LR 7-2(b). However, given that the City did not have the opportunity to address 16]| the issue of consolidating the trial on the merits, I grant leave to file a surreply. See Smith v. United 17|| States, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42142, at *17 (D. Nev. Mar. 28, 2014). 18 Conclusion 19 It is therefore ordered that defendant’s motion for [ECF No. 13] is GRANTED. 20 Dated: October 23, 2024 Lf 21 □ fe 4 — Cris "A D. Silva Unit d States District Judge 23 24 25 26