Maluf v. Bergelectric Corp ( 2024 )

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Jorge E. Ordonez Maluf, 4 2:23-cv-00115-CDS-MDC Plaintiff(s), 5 VS. Order 6 Bergelectric Corp., 7 Defendant(s). 8 The Court received the following email that purports to be from the Court Reporter of □□□□□□□□□□□ 9 deposition: 10 From: Georgene Withrow, RPR Sent: Monday, August 12, 2024 8:32 AM ll To: Court MDC Subject: Maluf V Bergelectric eauTION-exreRWaL: 13 Dear Sir, 14 My name is Georgene Withrow. I was the court reporter for the deposition of Jorge Ordonez Maluf & was subpoenaed to testify for a hearing in your courtroom last week, August 8 (Maluf V 15 Bergelectric). I specifically remember you telling the plaintiff that you did not need to hear from me. 16 oo, The next day, Aug 9th, the plaintiff's son showed up at my door again. He said he wanted to talk to me, I told him I didn't want 17 to be involved, that the judge specifically said I did not need to testify. He stated that they think my testimony is too important 18 & want it on the record. It was as if they totally ignored everything you said. He then pulled out another witness fee check & subpoena. 19 I refused the subpoena, I don't know that I should've done that, 20 but I don't know what to do at this point. I sure don't want to put my job in jeopardy over this either. I can't keep taking time off of work over this. I work 60-hour work weeks, I am helping to 21 raise my two grandsons. This has upset my home. 7 The first time they subpoenaed me, the son told me he went through my facebook page! I know it's public, but I can't help but feel violated. These are complete strangers. Why would they need to 23 go through my social media pages? I did a job & I went home. That's it, that's the extent of my involvement. I've been 24 a reporter for over 25 years & I've never had to deal with this. It's starting to feel like harassment & quite honestly creepy. I found myself walking around my home that night checking 25 my doors & windows. I should not have to feel this way over a deposition that I barely remember from three months ago. 1 I did ask him the date of the subpoena & he told me "the 20th." I am scheduled for an all-day deposition on August 20th & can't take that off, but I'm not even sure of the month. I just don't know 2 what to do. 3 Am I obligated to keep coming to these hearings? What are my rights? 4 Thank you for your time. 5 Georgene Withrow, NV CCR, RPR 6 While the allegations are concerning, the Court cannot act on such ex parte communication. 7 || Any requests for judicial relief or other Court action must be filed on the record and served on all g || affected parties. That said, plaintiff is cautioned that such conduct, if true and continued, will subject g || the plaintiff to considerable sanctions, including dismissal of his claims. 10 ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that: B 1. The Clerk of Court is directed to please mail a copy of this order to plaintiff at plaintiffs 14 || address of record: Jorge E. Ordonez Maluf 15 4952 S Rainbow Blvd #366 Las Vegas, NV 89118 16 310-343-0037 17 18 2. Defendant is directed to please mail a copy of this order to Court Reporter, Georgene 19 || Withrow. 20 21 Dated: August 13, 2024 p 4 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. vo af tM Za fii °3 □ jf \ L. fi ff pT 24 Hon. Maximifiano IJ. Couvillier III 35 United States Magistrate Judge 1 NOTICE 2 Pursuant to Local Rules IB 3-1 and IB 3-2, a party may object to orders and reports and 3 recommendations issued by the magistrate judge. Objections must be in writing and filed with the Clerk 4 of the Court within fourteen days. LR IB 3-1, 3-2. The Supreme Court has held that the courts of appeal 5 may determine that an appeal has been waived due to the failure to file objections within the specified 6 time. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 142 (1985). 7 This circuit has also held that (1) failure to file objections within the specified time and (2) failure 8 to properly address and brief the objectionable issues waives the right to appeal the District Court's order 9 and/or appeal factual issues from the order of the District Court. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 10 (9th Cir. 1991); Britt v. Simi Valley United Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Pursuant to LR 11 IA 3-1, the plaintiff must immediately file written notification with the court of any change of address. 12 The notification must include proof of service upon each opposing party’s attorney, or upon the opposing 13 party if the party is unrepresented by counsel. Failure to comply with this rule may result in dismissal of 14 the action. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25