Johnston v. Hartman ( 2024 )

2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 * * * 6 RICHARD JOHNSTON, Case No. 3:23-cv-00521-MMD-CLB 7 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 8 MARTHA SIMAS, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 Plaintiff Richard Johnston who is incarcerated in the custody of the Nevada 12 Department of Corrections (“NDOC”), has submitted a first amended civil rights complaint 13 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (ECF Nos. 5, 5-3). On June 24, 2024, the Court issued a 14 screening order, granting Plaintiff 30 days from the date of that order to file a second 15 amended complaint (“SAC”) curing the deficiencies of the first amended complaint. ECF 16 No. 11. On July 29, 2024, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time, 17 extending the time to file his SAC to September 6, 2024. ECF No. 14. 18 Plaintiff now moves for a copy of the docket sheet. ECF No. 17. Generally, an 19 inmate has no constitutional right to free photocopying or to obtain court documents 20 without payment. Johnson v. Moore, 948 F.2d 517, 521 (9th Cir. 1991). The fundamental 21 constitutional right of access to the courts requires prison authorities to help inmates 22 prepare and file “meaningful legal papers by providing prisoners with adequate law 23 libraries or adequate assistance from persons trained in the law,” Bounds v. Smith, 430 24 U.S. 817, 828 (1977); it does not impose an obligation “to finance and support prisoner 25 litigation,” Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343, 384–85 (1996). Federal courts do not allow 26 prisoners or any other litigants to accrue copy fees—payment for copy fees is required at 27 the time a request is made. LR IC 1-1(i)(5) (paper copies of filed documents may be 28 1 || obtained from the clerk’s office after payment of copying fees).’ As a one-time courtesy 2 || to Plaintiff, however the Court will instruct the clerk’s office to send him one copy of the 3 || current docket sheet for this case. Accordingly, Plaintiffs motion for docket sheet is 4 || granted. 5 On July 29, 2024, Plaintiff filed a second motion for extension of time to file his 6 || SAC because he was concerned that his first motion to extend may not have been filed 7 || in its entirety. ECF No. 13. Because the Court has already granted his first motion for 8 || extension of time, Plaintiff's second motion for extension of time is duplicative. The Court 9 || denies his second motion for extension of time as moot. 10 It is therefore ordered that Plaintiff's motion for docket sheet (ECF No. 17) is 11 || granted. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to send Plaintiff one copy of the current 12 || docket sheet for this case. 13 It is further ordered that Plaintiff's motion to extend time (ECF No. 13) is denied as 14 || moot. 15 DATED THIS 19th day of August, 2024. 16 ‘ 17 18 UNITED STATE GISTRATE JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 |—__ 1 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1914, the Judicial Conference has adopted a schedule 27 || of fees for copying and related services provided by the United States Courts. A fee of 50¢ per page is charged for court staff to reproduce any record or paper filed in a case. 28 || See Fee Schedule, available on the court’s website at https:/Awww.nvd.uscourts.gov/court-information/fee-schedule/. 95