Walker-Goggins v. Social Security Administration ( 2024 )

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 ANNETTE WALKER-GOGGINS, Case No. 2:15-cv-01839-JCM-EJY 5 Plaintiff, ORDER 6 v. 7 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, 8 Defendant. 9 10 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Annette Walker-Goggins’ Motion to Bound Over 11 Emergency Injunction Appeal Speedy Trial Cease and Desist Discovery Judgment. ECF No. 41. 12 Before dismissal, Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking to appeal a decision by the Social Security 13 Administration. On May 17, 2016, Plaintiff’s claims were dismissed with prejudice and the case 14 was closed. ECF No. 13. Plaintiff has filed numerous filings since the case’s closure, all of which 15 have been denied. See ECF Nos. 18, 21, 23, 27, 31, 40. 16 The instant Motion is incoherent containing seemingly unrelated requests. ECF No. 41. 17 Plaintiff’s Motion is non-sensical and fails to state a basis for relief. In addition, Plaintiff’s Motion 18 is entirely devoid of cogent legal argument. See LR 7-2(d) (“The failure of a moving party to file 19 points and authorities in support of the motion constitutes a consent to the denial of the motion”). 20 Plaintiff’s Motion does not pertain to any pending issue in her case and as such should be denied as 21 a fugitive filing. See Martin v. Velazquez, Case No. 3:20-cv-00563-MMD-CLB, 2022 WL 2317270, 22 at *2 (D. Nev. June 28, 2022). 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Bound Over Emergency 24 Injunction Appeal Speedy Trial Cease and Desist Discovery Judgment (ECF No. 41) is DENIED. 25 Dated this 3rd day of September, 2024. 26 27