Mkhitaryan v. County of Clark ( 2024 )

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6| SERGEY MKHITARYAN, Case No. 2:24-cv-00708-RFB-NJK 7 Plaintiff(s), gly. Order 91 COUNTY OF CLARK, 10 Defendant(s). 11 The Court possesses the inherent authority to reconsider its interlocutory orders. United States v. Martin, 226 F.3d 1042, 1049 (9th Cir. 2000). 13 Plaintiff had filed a motion indicating that he required the assistance of counsel due to his 14] “competency.” Docket No. 2. Given the context, the Court construed the motion as a notice of 15] incompetency and appointed counsel to represent Plaintiff based thereon. Docket No. 8. Counsel 16]| has now appeared for Plaintiff and indicated that he has in fact been deemed competent by another 17] judge. Docket No. 11 at 4; see also Docket No. 11-1. In light of this correction, the Court 18] VACATES its order appointing counsel and the Clerk’s Office is INSTRUCTED to remove the Federal Public Defender’s office as counsel of record. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: September 12, 2024 22 =< a Nancy . Koppe 23 United States ‘Magistrate Judge 24 25 26 27 28