Johnson, III v. Hospital Corporation Of America ( 2024 )

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 WILLIA JOHNSON III, et al., ) 4 ) Plaintiff, ) Case No.: 2:24-cv-01289-GMN-BNW 5 vs. ) 6 ) ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND Hospital Corporation of America, et al., ) RECOMMENDATION 7 ) Defendants. ) 8 ) 9 Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), (ECF No. 4), of 10 United States Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler, which recommends dismissing Plaintiff’s 11 claims against all Defendants without prejudice. Plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee or submit 12 an application to proceed in forma pauperis. 13 A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a 14 United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); 15 D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo 16 determination of those portions to which objections are made if the Magistrate Judge’s findings 17 and recommendations concern matters that may not be finally determined by a magistrate 18 judge. D. Nev. R. IB 3-2(b). The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the 19 findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. R. 20 IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is not required to conduct “any 21 review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 22 140, 149 (1985) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a 23 district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s R&R where no objections have been 24 filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1122 (9th Cir. 2003). 25 Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed. (See R&R, ECF 1 || No. 4) (setting a September 10, 2024 deadline for objections). 2 Accordingly, 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 4), is 4 |} ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. 6 Dated this _30_ day of September, 2024. □□ Gloria M/Niavarro, District Judge 9 United District Court 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 2 of 2