Sintigo v. Pompeo ( 2024 )

1 JUAnSitOedN S Mtat.e Fs RAItEtoRrnSeOyN 2 District of Nevada Nevada Bar No. 7709 3 VIRGINIA T. TOMOVA 4 Assistant United States Attorney Nevada Bar No. 12504 5 501 Las Vegas Blvd. So., Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 6 (702) 388-6530 Virginia.Tomova@usdoj.gov 7 Attorneys for the Federal Defendants 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 Susan Sintigo, Case No. 2:19-cv-00465-APG-MDC 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. Stipulation to Dismiss and Order 13 Secretary Antony Blinken; United States 14 Department of State Consul General Eric S. Cohan; Attorney General Merrick Garland; 15 United States Department of Justice; DOES I-IX. 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Susan Sintigo and Defendants Secretary Anthony Blinken, United States 19 Department of State Consul General Eric S. Cohan, Attorney General Merrick Garland, 20 and United States Department of Justice (“Federal Defendants”), through their respective 21 counsel, hereby stipulate that her action be, and is hereby, dismissed with prejudice 22 pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with each party to 23 bear its own costs and fees of suit. 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 1 Plaintiff's claims are moot considering the United States Supreme Court decision in 2 || Dep’t of State v. Murioz, issued on June 21, 2024. Id., No. 23-334, 602 U.S. __, 2024 U.S. 3 || LEXIS 2716. Accordingly, Plaintiff's claims should be dismissed with prejudice. 4 Respectfully submitted this 28th day of June 2024. 5 THE PARIENTE LAW FIRM, P.C. JASON M. FRIERSON steer eS /s/ Michael D. Pariente, Esq. /s/ Virginia T. Tomova 7 ||| MICHAEL D. PARIENTE, ESQ. VIRGINIA T. TOMOVA Nevada Bar No. 9469 Assistant United States Attorney 8 ||) 3960 Howard Hughes Pkwy., Ste. 615 Attorneys for the Federal Defendants 9 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 10 Attorney for Plaintiff 11 IT IS SO ORDERED: 12 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE DATED: July 41,2024 0 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 of 2