Taliaoa v. Wolfson ( 2024 )


Menu:
  • 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Vaelii Clifton Taliaoa, Case No. 2:24-cv-01853-JAD-BNW 4 Petitioner 5 v. Scheduling Order 6 Jeremy Bean, et al., 7 Respondents 8 9 Because the Federal Public Defender has entered an appearance on behalf of Petitioner 10 Vaelii Clifton Taliaoa,1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 11 1. The Federal Public Defender, through Shelly Richter, Esq., is appointed as 12 counsel for the petitioner under 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B). Ms. Richter will 13 represent the petitioner in all federal proceedings related to this matter, including 14 any appeals or certiorari proceedings, unless allowed to withdraw. 15 2. Petitioner will have until February 7, 2025, to file an amended petition or seek 16 other appropriate relief. This deadline and any extensions of it may not be 17 construed as implied findings regarding the federal limitation period or a basis for 18 tolling. Petitioner at all times remains responsible for calculating the limitation 19 period and timely asserting claims, without regard to any court-ordered deadlines 20 or extensions. So, a petition or amended petition filed within a court-ordered 21 deadline may still be dismissed as untimely if it violates the statute of limitations.2 22 23 1 ECF No. 6. 2 See Sossa v. Diaz, 729 F.3d 1225, 1235 (9th Cir. 2013). 1 3. If the petitioner files an amended petition, respondents will have 60 days from the 2 date of service to respond to it—including by motion to dismiss. Petitioner will 3 have 30 days from the date of service of an answer to file a reply. However, 4 Local Rule LR 7-2(b) governs the scheduling for responses and replies to motions 5 filed by either party, including motions filed in lieu of pleadings. 6 4. Any procedural defenses raised by respondents to the counseled amended petition 7 must be raised together in a single, consolidated motion to dismiss. Successive 8 motions to dismiss will not be entertained, and any procedural defenses omitted 9 from the consolidated motion to dismiss will be waived. Respondents may not 10 file a response that consolidates their procedural defenses, if any, with their 11 response on the merits. But arguments that an unexhausted claim clearly lacks 12 merit may be included in a procedural-defense response. If respondents do seek 13 dismissal of unexhausted claims under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(2) they must: (1) do 14 so in a single motion to dismiss, not in the answer; and (2) specifically direct their 15 argument to the standard for dismissal under § 2254(b)(2) as set forth in Cassett v. 16 Stewart.3 Basically, no procedural defenses, including exhaustion, may be 17 included with the merits in an answer. All procedural defenses, including 18 exhaustion, must be raised in a single dismissal motion. 19 5. In any answer filed on the merits, respondents must specifically cite to and 20 address the applicable state-court-written decision and state-court-record 21 materials, if any, regarding each claim within the response as to that claim. 22 23 3 Cassett v. Stewart, 406 F.3d 614, 623–24 (9th Cir. 2005). ] 6. Any state-court record and related exhibits filed by either party must be filed with a 2 separate exhibit index identifying the exhibits by number. The CM/ECF attachments 3 that are filed must then be identified by the corresponding indexed identifying 4 number. Ifthe filed exhibits span more than one ECF Number in the record, the first 5 document under each successive ECF Number must be either: (1) another copy of the 6 index, (2) a volume cover page, or (3) some other document serving as a filler, so that 7 each exhibit under the ECF Number will be listed under an attachment number. For 8 example, the filler page would be filed as ECF No. 1, and the exhibits would be filed 9 as ECF No. 1-1, 1-2, 1-3, ete. And if there are more exhibits than can be attached to 10 ECF No. 1, then ECF No. 2 would be a filler page with the exhibits as ECF Nos. 2-1, 11 2-2, 2-3, etc. 12 7. Do not provide courtesy copies of electronically filed exhibits. 13 Dated: November 7, 2024 U.S. District Fudge Jen hifer A. Dorsey 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Document Info

Docket Number: 2:24-cv-01853

Filed Date: 11/7/2024

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/12/2024