Williams v. La Vie Residences ( 2024 )

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Case No.: 2:24-cv-01554-JAD-EJY 4 Ryan Williams, 5 laintiff Plainti Order Adopting Report & Recommendatio 6 and Dismissing Action v. 7 g La Vie Residences, et al., [ECF No. 7] 9 Defendants 10 After all of his claims were dismissed with leave and instructions for amendment, this 1] || court ordered Plaintiff Ryan Williams to file an amended complaint by September 27, 2024, or 12 having this case dismissed and closed.! Williams failed to file an amended complaint or 13 || seek to extend his deadline to do so, and the magistrate judge now recommends that this case be 14 || dismissed and closed because there are no claims pending.” The deadline for the plaintiff to 15 || object to that recommendation was October 21, 2024, and he neither filed objections nor moved 16 || to extend the deadline to do so. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and 17 || recommendation unless objections are filed.”? Having reviewed the R&R, I find good cause to 18 || adopt it, and I do. 19 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 20 || Recommendation [ECF No. 7] is ADOPTED in its entirety. This action is DISMISSED 21 || without prejudice, and the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. 22 Cl Yo’, —__( □□ 23 USS. District Judge J ennifer/A. Dorse 24 November 7, 202 || 26 ||! ECF No. 5. 97 ||? ECF No. 7. 28 > Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).