Schenck v. Behgler , 6 N.Y. St. Rep. 856 ( 1887 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam

    The default herein was regularly taken, and the counsel for defendants asks to have it opened and *387the case restored. We have looked into the return upon which the case would have to be argued in this court. It is very brief, and not an exception in it worthy of a moment’s consideration. The question as to the verdict being excessive cannot be reviewed here. Under these circumstances, the motion to open the default should be denied, with ten dollars costs.

    All concur.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 1 Silv. Ct. App. 385, 6 N.Y. St. Rep. 856

Filed Date: 3/25/1887

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/14/2024