Beardsley v. . American Bonding Company of Baltimore ( 1923 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    We think the defendant has been improperly credited with payments made before September 7, 1909, to sub-brokers employed by plaintiff’s firm, and also for the firm’s office expenses.

    The plaintiff’s recovery should, therefore, be increased by adding thereto the sum of $1,120.14.

    As so modified, the judgment should be affirmed, without costs to either party as against the other.

    Hiscock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur.

    Judgment accordingly.

Document Info

Judges: <italic>Per Curiam</italic>.

Filed Date: 2/27/1923

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/12/2024