-
Order affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the allegations of the return, if accepted as true, fail to justify a variation of the uses prescribed by the zoning resolution; no opinion.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 171 N.E. 797, 253 N.Y. 594, 1930 N.Y. LEXIS 964
Filed Date: 5/6/1930
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/12/2024