-
The complaint should not have been dismissed as against these defendants-respondents. Their communications were protected by a qualified privilege but plaintiff's proof made out a primafacie case of malice. (Ashcroft v. Hammond,
197 N.Y. 488 .) The question was for the jury.The judgments should be reversed and a new trial granted with costs to abide the event.
LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY and DESMOND, JJ., concur.
Judgments reversed, etc. *Page 191
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 48 N.E.2d 319, 290 N.Y. 188, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1121
Judges: <italic>Per Curiam.</italic>
Filed Date: 4/8/1943
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/12/2024