Tozer v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad , 6 N.Y. St. Rep. 447 ( 1887 )

Per Curiam.

This case falls within our decision in Strohm v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 96 N. Y. 305. The testimony which was received under exception, as to the ulterior consequences which might ensue or be apprehended from the injuries received by the plaintiff, was quite as objectionable as that for the reception of which the judgment in the case cited was reversed.

The judgment appealed from should be reversed and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event.

All concur.