RAM I LLC v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal , 26 N.Y.3d 1068 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • OPINION OF THE COURT

    Memorandum.

    The appeal should be dismissed, without costs, as moot.

    The tenant having vacated the rent-controlled apartment at issue, pursuant to a stipulation of settlement with petitioner, this appeal has been rendered moot (see Matter of Grand Jury Subpoenas for Locals 17, 135, 257 & 608 of United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am., AFL-CIO, 72 NY2d 307, 311 [1988]; Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707 [1980]). The exception to the mootness doctrine is not applicable here (see Wisholek v Douglas, 97 NY2d 740, 742 [2002]).

    Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Pigott, Rivera, AbdusSalaam, Stein and Fahey concur.

    Appeal dismissed, without costs, as moot, in a memorandum.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 26 N.Y.3d 1068, 44 N.E.3d 221, 23 N.Y.S.3d 146

Judges: Abdussalaam, Fahey, Lippman, Pigott, Rivera, Stein

Filed Date: 12/15/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024