-
*806 Order reversed and the petition dismissed, with costs against petitioner-respondent, on the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division. We disagree with the rule stated in Matter of Elwyn (285 App. Div. 91) with respect to application of paragraph (d) of subdivision 1 of section 140 of the Surrogate’s Court Act. Question certified answered in the negative.Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating, Breitel and Jasen.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 21 N.Y.2d 804, 235 N.E.2d 773, 288 N.Y.S.2d 634, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1610
Filed Date: 2/15/1968
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024