Girards v. Board of Education , 40 N.Y.2d 1020 ( 1976 )


Menu:
  • Order affirmed, without costs (Matter of Anderson v Board of Educ., 38 NY2d 897). There is nothing in this record to suggest that appellant’s probationary appointment was terminated for a constitutionally impermissible purpose or in violation of statutory proscription (James v Board of Educ., 37 NY2d 891, 892).

    Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 40 N.Y.2d 1020, 359 N.E.2d 1368, 391 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3154

Filed Date: 12/20/1976

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024