Panico v. Young ( 1979 )


Menu:
  • Motion for leave to appeal denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see, e.g., Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 NY 284, 297-298 [Cardozo, Ch. J.]; Matter of Brooklyn Hosp. v Lennon, 45 NY2d 820).

Document Info

Filed Date: 1/9/1979

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024