Enzler v. Saretsky ( 1956 )

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. The suggested ambiguity requiring interpretation and application of the order may appropriately be made the subject of a ruling at Special Term, Part II. The date for the examination to proceed shall be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Concur — Peck, P. J., Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Rabin, JJ.