Gladstein & Isaac v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance , 918 N.Y.2d 92 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  • The court properly determined that the allegations in the underlying complaint that plaintiffs’ law firm negligently hired and supervised an attorney who purportedly made sexual advances to a client, fall within the type of errors and omissions coverage provided by defendant’s professional liability insurance policy (see Watkins Glen Cent. School Dist. v National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa., 286 AD2d 48 [2001]).

    While the allegations may not fall under the policy definition of “Personal Injury,” the court properly determined that they fall within the policy’s definition of “Wrongful Act.” Concur— *469Tom, J.E, Sweeny, Renwick, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 82 A.D.3d 468, 918 N.Y.2d 92

Filed Date: 3/8/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024