-
*416 The court properly denied appellant’s suppression motion. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations. The officer’s testimony established a lawful seizure under the plain view doctrine, and we do not find that testimony to be implausible or unworthy of belief. Concur — Tom, J.E, Andrias, Catterson, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 90 A.D.3d 415, 933 N.Y.2d 552
Filed Date: 12/1/2011
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024