In re Nelson R. , 933 N.Y.2d 552 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  • *416The court properly denied appellant’s suppression motion. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations. The officer’s testimony established a lawful seizure under the plain view doctrine, and we do not find that testimony to be implausible or unworthy of belief. Concur — Tom, J.E, Andrias, Catterson, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 90 A.D.3d 415, 933 N.Y.2d 552

Filed Date: 12/1/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024