-
Judgment unanimously modified, on the law, and, as modified, affirmed, in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant, together with others was indicted and charged with two counts of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law, §§ 20.00, 160.10, subd 2, pars [a], [b]) and one count of grand larceny in the third degree (Penal Law, §§ 20.00,155.30, subd 1). The charges arise out of a holdup of a drug store in the City of Niagara Falls during which an employee of the store was struck on the head with a “gun” that later was identified to be a cigarette lighter. Approximately $100 was taken from the store’s cash register. Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law, §§ 20.00,160.10, subd 2) and petit larceny (Penal Law, § 155.25). On the facts of this case, defendant’s conviction of the crime of petit larceny constitutes a lesser included offense to robbery in the second degree (see People v Acevedo, 40 NY2d 701, 706-707; People v Whipset, 80 AD2d 986; People v White, 57 AD2d 1076). Although this issue was not raised on appeal, where the verdict is comprised of inclusory concurrent counts a verdict of guilty on the greatest count is deemed a dismissal of every lesser count (CPL 300.40, subd 3, par [b]; People v Grier, 37 NY2d 847, 848). Accordingly, the judgment convicting defendant of petit larceny must be reversed and the sentence vacated. (Appeal from judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J. — robbery, second degree, petit larceny.) Present — Simons, J. P., Callahan, Doerr, Boomer and Moule, JJ.
Document Info
Filed Date: 11/9/1982
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/1/2024