-
On this appeal, the appellant asserts that its motion to vacate its default should have been granted in the interest of justice. We disagree. The Supreme Court did not, under the circumstances of this case, improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the appellant’s motion to vacate the order dated October 16, 2009. Skelos, J.P., Balkin, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 101 A.D.3d 705, 954 N.Y.2d 481
Filed Date: 12/5/2012
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024