Williams v. Town of Greenburgh , 955 N.Y.2d 523 ( 2012 )


Menu:
  • The defendants demonstrated their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by establishing, through competent medical evidence, that the plaintiffs condition did not result from the subject accident (see Scott v Martinez, 99 AD3d 984 [2012]; Enyah v Sherpa, 98 AD3d 993 [2012]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The affidavit of the plaintiffs expert was conclusory on the issue of whether the plaintiffs condition was the result of the subject accident (see Barry v Future Cab Corp., 71 AD3d 710 [2010]; Piperis v Wan, 49 AD3d 840 [2008]). Accordingly, the defendants’ motion should have been granted. Skelos, J.P., Balkin, Chambers and Miller, JJ., concur.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 101 A.D.3d 990, 955 N.Y.2d 523

Filed Date: 12/19/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024