Porcelli v. Zapparo , 528 N.Y.S.2d 124 ( 1988 )

We find that the Supreme Court erred in granting the defendant summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The hospital record X-ray report bearing the defendant’s stamped signature constituted admissible documentary evidence (CPLR 4518 [b]) sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendant was involved in the alleged erroneous interpretation of the X ray. Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.