People v. Colon ( 1988 )


Menu:
  • Under the circumstances, we find that the Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s pro se motion to withdraw his pleas without holding an evidentiary hearing (see, People v Tinsley, 35 NY2d 926, 927). Mollen, P. J., Lawrence, Fiber, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Document Info

Filed Date: 5/16/1988

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/31/2024