-
Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated at Special Term, Finnerty, J. We add only that petitioner’s contention that he is entitled to a name-clearing hearing was not raised at Special Term and thus has not been preserved for appellate review (see, Tumolillo v Tumolillo, 51 NY2d 790; Arvantides v Arvantides, 106 AD2d 853, mod 64 NY2d 1033). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Steuben County, Finnerty, J. — art 78.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 151 A.D.2d 968, 544 N.Y.S.2d 516, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8276
Filed Date: 6/2/1989
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024