-
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The court properly denied plaintiffs’ motion to reargue (which was deemed a motion to renew) because plaintiffs failed to offer a valid excuse for not submitting the additional facts with the original application (see, Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Livingston County, Cicoria, J. — Renewal.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Lawton, Boehm and Davis, JJ.
Document Info
Docket Number: Appeal No. 2
Filed Date: 11/18/1992
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/31/2024