-
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gub
*880 bay, J.), rendered March 28, 2013, adjudicating him a youthful offender, upon his plea of guilty to robbery in the third degree, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]; People v Sedita, 113 AD3d 638 [2014]).
Mastro, J.E, Hall, Lott, Austin and Duffy, JJ., concur.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 117 A.D.3d 879, 984 N.Y.S.2d 885
Judges: Austin, Duffy, Hall, Lott, Mastro
Filed Date: 5/14/2014
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024