People v. Rodriguez , 639 N.Y.2d 725 ( 1996 )


Menu:
  • *565The defendant’s contentions regarding the prosecutor’s summation at the trial under Indictment No. 1060/86 are, in part, unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, all are without merit.

    Because the trial court repeatedly recited that the People must prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the charge as a whole conveyed the proper standard of proof (see, People v Talk Kwung, 186 AD2d 365).

    In view of our determination with respect to the defendant’s judgment of conviction under Indictment No. 1060/86, upon a jury verdict, there is no basis for vacatur of his plea under Indictment No. 807/80 (cf., People v Clark, 45 NY2d 432). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 225 A.D.2d 564, 639 N.Y.2d 725, 639 N.Y.S.2d 725, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1853

Filed Date: 3/4/1996

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/31/2024