Morrell v. New York State Racing & Wagering Board ( 1996 )


Menu:
  • Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the respondent’s determination is supported by substantial evidence in the record (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222).

    The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit (cf., Matter of LaChance v Corbisiero, 160 AD2d 293). Thompson, J. P., Joy, Hart and Plorio, JJ., concur.

Document Info

Filed Date: 3/11/1996

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/31/2024