Berra v. Mughal ( 1996 )


Menu:
  • *402Inasmuch as the defendants failed to establish a meritorious defense, the Supreme Court properly denied their motion to vacate the judgment entered upon their default in answering the complaint (see, CPLR 317, 5015 [a]; Fennell v Mason, 204 AD2d 599; Halali v Gabbay, 223 AD2d 623). Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Copertino, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Document Info

Filed Date: 6/3/1996

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/31/2024