Laur & Mack Contracting v. DiCienzo ( 1996 )

—Appeal from order insofar as it denied reargument unanimously dismissed and order affirmed without costs. Same Memorandum as in Laur & Mack Contr. Co. v DiCienzo ([appeal No. 1] — AD2d — [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Rath, Jr., J.—Arbitration.) Present— Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Doerr and Balio, JJ.