Dumbadze v. Agency of Canadian Car & Foundry Co. , 263 A.D. 1018 ( 1942 )

Plaintiff appeals from a resettled order denying his motion to strike out as insufficient in law the defenses numbered “ First ” to “ Ninth ” in defendant’s amended answer. In his brief plaintiff admits defenses numbered “ Second ” and “ Fourth ” are sufficient. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Appeal from the original order dismissed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.