People v. Contreras , 485 N.Y.S.2d 261 ( 1985 )


Menu:
  • Kupferman, J. P.,

    dissents in a memorandum as follows: The defendant not having taken the stand, the Sandoval ruling cannot be called in question. (See, Luce v United States, 469 US _, 105 S Ct 460.)

    As to the evidence, it was made clear, as the complainant testified, that the defendant had two front teeth missing. While the popular song is to the effect “All I Want For Christmas Is My Two Front Teeth”, and it is now into the new year, this vacuum can make a lasting impression. Witness the memory of the missing front teeth of the heavyweight boxer, Leon Spinks.

    *630It cannot be said that the complainant did not suffer “substantial pain.” (Penal Law § 10.00 [9].)

    I would affirm.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 108 A.D.2d 627, 485 N.Y.S.2d 261, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42978

Judges: Kupferman

Filed Date: 2/7/1985

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/28/2024