PECK, KENLEY, PEOPLE v ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •            SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
    Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
    1148
    KA 08-00330
    PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ.
    THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
    V                              MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
    KENLEY PECK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (PHILIP ROTHSCHILD OF
    COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (SUSAN C.
    AZZARELLI OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
    Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Jeffrey R.
    Merrill, A.J.), rendered January 8, 2008. The appeal was held by this
    Court by order entered December 23, 2011, decision was reserved and
    the matter was remitted to Onondaga County Court for further
    proceedings (90 AD3d 1500). The proceedings were held and completed
    (Jeffrey R. Merrill, A.J.).
    It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is
    unanimously affirmed.
    Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him
    upon his plea of guilty of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law §
    140.20). This Court previously held the case, reserved decision and
    remitted the matter to County Court “to conduct an inquiry to
    determine whether there was a legitimate basis for defendant’s
    termination from the drug treatment program, including whether
    defendant’s postplea arrests were without foundation” (People v Peck,
    90 AD3d 1500, 1501). We conclude that, upon remittal, the court
    conducted a sufficient inquiry pursuant to People v Outley (80 NY2d
    702, 713) to satisfy itself that defendant’s postplea arrest in
    Camillus, New York had a legitimate basis and thus constituted a
    violation of the conditions of the drug treatment program and the plea
    agreement (see People v Fiammegta, 14 NY3d 90, 97; People v Marshall,
    231 AD2d 893, 894-895, lv denied 89 NY2d 866). Inasmuch as we
    conclude that defendant’s arrest in Camillus justified his removal
    from the drug treatment program, we need not address defendant’s
    remaining contentions.
    Entered:    November 16, 2012                      Frances E. Cafarell
    Clerk of the Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: KA 08-00330

Filed Date: 11/16/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/8/2016