NEWKIRK, DEQWAUN L., PEOPLE v ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •            SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
    Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
    1073
    KA 11-00583
    PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ.
    THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
    V                              MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
    DEQWAUN L. NEWKIRK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (BARBARA J. DAVIES OF
    COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DAVID A. HERATY OF
    COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
    Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County
    (Christopher J. Burns, J.), rendered December 21, 2010. The judgment
    convicted defendant, upon a nonjury verdict, of criminal possession of
    a weapon in the second degree.
    It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is
    unanimously affirmed.
    Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a
    nonjury verdict of criminal possession of a weapon in the second
    degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3]), defendant contends that the evidence
    is legally insufficient to establish that he possessed the loaded
    firearm found by the police in the basement of a suspected drug house
    in which he was located when the police executed a search warrant (see
    generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). We reject that
    contention. The evidence at trial established that defendant was the
    only person in the house when the police entered, and an officer
    testified that, immediately before the police gained entry, he heard
    the sounds of someone inside running down and then up the basement
    stairs. When questioned by the police, defendant admitted that he had
    purchased the firearm in question, a photograph of which was on the
    screen saver of defendant’s cell phone, and it was later determined
    that defendant’s DNA was on the firearm. That evidence, when viewed
    in the light most favorable to the People (see People v Contes, 60
    NY2d 620, 621), is legally sufficient to establish that defendant
    possessed the firearm (see § 10.00 [8]; People v Manini, 79 NY2d 561,
    573-574; People v Sierra, 45 NY2d 56, 59-60).
    Entered:    November 16, 2012                      Frances E. Cafarell
    Clerk of the Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: KA 11-00583

Filed Date: 11/16/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/8/2016