JOHNSTON, WILLIAM B. v. KIRKLAND, GALEN D. ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •         SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
    Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
    971
    TP 12-00005
    PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, AND SCONIERS, JJ.
    IN THE MATTER OF WILLIAM B. JOHNSTON,
    PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
    V                                MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
    GALEN D. KIRKLAND, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK
    STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS,
    RESPONDENT-PETITIONER,
    SCOTT GEHL, HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES MADE
    EQUAL, INC., STEPHANIE M. GILLIAM, ERIC T.
    SCHNEIDERMAN, NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL,
    MAYOR BYRON W. BROWN AND ERIE COUNTY EXECUTIVE
    CHRISTOPHER C. COLLINS, RESPONDENTS.
    WILLIAM B. JOHNSTON, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT PRO SE.
    CAROLINE J. DOWNEY, BRONX (TONI ANN HOLLIFIELD OF COUNSEL), FOR
    RESPONDENT-PETITIONER.
    JENNIFER METZGER KIMURA, BUFFALO, FOR RESPONDENTS SCOTT GEHL AND
    HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES MADE EQUAL, INC. AND STEPHANIE M. GILLIAM.
    MICHAEL A. SIRAGUSA, COUNTY ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (SHAWN P. HENNESSY OF
    COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT ERIE COUNTY EXECUTIVE CHRISTOPHER C. COLLINS.
    TIMOTHY A. BALL, CORPORATION COUNSEL, BUFFALO (CINDY T. COOPER OF
    COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT MAYOR BYRON W. BROWN.
    ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (ANDREW B. AYERS OF
    COUNSEL), RESPONDENT PRO SE.
    Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 (transferred to the
    Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial
    Department by order of the Supreme Court, Erie County [Timothy J.
    Walker, A.J.], entered September 2, 2011) to annul a determination of
    the New York State Division of Human Rights. The determination found
    that petitioner had engaged in unlawful discriminatory practices with
    respect to housing.
    It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously
    confirmed without costs, the petition is dismissed, the cross petition
    is granted, and petitioner-respondent is directed to pay respondent
    Stephanie M. Gilliam the sum of $2,500 as damages for mental anguish
    and humiliation, with interest at the rate of 9% per annum commencing
    -2-                           971
    TP 12-00005
    February 3, 2011; to pay respondent Housing Opportunities Made Equal,
    Inc. the sum of $4,281 for economic damages, with interest at the rate
    of 9% per annum commencing March 31, 2009, and the sum of $8,000 for
    punitive damages, with interest at the rate of 9% per annum commencing
    February 3, 2011; and to pay the Comptroller of the State of New York
    the sum of $15,000 for a civil fine and penalty, with interest at the
    rate of 9% per annum commencing February 3, 2011.
    Memorandum: Petitioner-respondent, William B. Johnston
    (petitioner), commenced this proceeding pursuant to Executive Law §
    298 seeking to annul the determination of the New York State Division
    of Human Rights (Division) that petitioner had engaged in unlawful
    discriminatory practices with respect to housing. The determination
    confirmed the recommended order of the Administrative Law Judge, which
    was issued after a hearing, and ordered, inter alia, that petitioner
    pay various damages, penalties and fines. Respondent-petitioner
    Commissioner of the Division filed a cross petition seeking an order
    confirming the determination and directing petitioner to comply with
    the determination. In addition, in their answer, respondents Scott
    Gehl of Housing Opportunities Made Equal, Inc. and Stephanie M.
    Gilliam raised the affirmative defense that the proceeding is time-
    barred. The proceeding was transferred to this Court pursuant to
    Executive Law § 298 and 22 NYCRR 202.57 (c) (2).
    We agree with respondents Gehl and Gilliam that the proceeding is
    time-barred, and we therefore dismiss the petition. Executive Law §
    298 requires that a proceeding challenging a determination of the
    Division must be brought “within sixty days after the service of such
    an order,” and the determination contains a notice that petitioner
    must comply with that requirement. Here, the proceeding was commenced
    63 days after service of the determination, and it is well settled
    that “[t]he provisions of CPLR 2103 (subd [c]) prescribing extensions
    of time where service on a party is made by mail do not apply to
    administrative proceedings” (Matter of Fiedelman v New York State
    Dept. of Health, 58 NY2d 80, 81; see generally Matter of Lester v New
    York State Off. of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preserv., 60 AD3d 680,
    681, lv denied 12 NY3d 712).
    We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and
    conclude that they are without merit.
    Entered:   November 9, 2012                     Frances E. Cafarell
    Clerk of the Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: TP 12-00005

Filed Date: 11/9/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/8/2016