J., WYQUANZA, MTR. OF ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •         SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
    Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
    402
    CAF 11-00665
    PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND SCONIERS, JJ.
    IN THE MATTER OF WYQUANZA J. AND SINCERE J.
    -------------------------------------------
    ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES,       MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
    PETITIONER-RESPONDENT;
    LISA J., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
    ALAN BIRNHOLZ, EAST AMHERST, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
    JOSEPH T. JARZEMBEK, BUFFALO, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.
    DAVID C. SCHOPP, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF
    BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (CHARLES D. HALVORSEN OF COUNSEL), FOR WYQUANZA
    J. AND SINCERE J.
    Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Margaret
    O. Szczur, J.), entered March 7, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to
    Family Court Act article 10. The order, among other things, adjudged
    that respondent had abused and neglected the subject children.
    It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is
    unanimously affirmed without costs.
    Memorandum: Respondent mother appeals from an order determining
    that she abused and neglected her two-month-old child and derivatively
    abused and neglected her two-year-old child. We reject the mother’s
    contention that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the
    determination. Petitioner presented evidence, including the testimony
    of a physician, establishing that the younger child sustained
    fractures of his left humerus, right humerus, left tibia and several
    ribs, and that the injuries were inflicted at different times.
    Petitioner thereby established a prima facie case of child abuse and
    neglect with respect to the younger child pursuant to Family Court Act
    § 1046 (a) (ii), “and the mother failed to rebut the presumption of
    parental responsibility” (Matter of Seth G., 50 AD3d 1530, 1531; see
    Matter of Michael I., 276 AD2d 839, 840-841, lv denied 96 NY2d 701;
    see generally Matter of Philip M., 82 NY2d 238, 245-247).
    Petitioner also established by a preponderance of the evidence
    that the older child was derivatively abused and neglected, inasmuch
    as the abuse and neglect of the younger child “is so closely connected
    with the care of [the older] child as to indicate that [he] is equally
    at risk” (Matter of Marino S., 100 NY2d 361, 374, cert denied 
    540 US 1059
    ). Indeed, the abuse and neglect of the younger child
    -2-                           402
    CAF 11-00665
    “demonstrates such an impaired level of judgment by the [mother] as to
    create a substantial risk of harm for any child in her care” (Matter
    of Aaron McC., 65 AD3d 1149, 1150).
    Entered:   March 23, 2012                       Frances E. Cafarell
    Clerk of the Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: CAF 11-00665

Filed Date: 3/23/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/8/2016